Math 360, Fall 2016, Assignment 9
From cartan.math.umb.edu
Mathematical proofs, like diamonds, are hard as well as clear, and will be touched with nothing but strict reasoning.
- - John Locke, Second Reply to the Bishop of Worcester
Carefully define the following terms, then give one example and one non-example of each:[edit]
- Even permutation.
- Odd permutation.
- Sign (of a permutation).
- Alternating group.
- Dihedral group.
- Left congruence (modulo a subgroup $H$).
Carefully state the following theorems (you need not prove them):[edit]
- Theorem concerning the number of transpositions appearing in a decomposition of a given permutation into transpositions.
- Rules of sign for permutations.
- Formula for the inverse of a product.
- Theorem characterizing left congruence as a relation of a certain type.
Solve the following problems:[edit]
- Let $G$ be any group and let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. Define a relation $\sim_{r,H}$ (called "right congruence modulo $H$") by declaring that $g_1\sim_{r,H}g_2$ if and only if $g_2g_1^{-1}\in H$. Prove that right congruence is always an equivalence relation on $G$. (Note that this is at least potentially different from our definition of "left congruence," in which $g_1\sim_{l,H}g_2$ if and only if $g_2^{-1}g_1\in H$. The reason for calling these relations "left" and "right" congruence will become clear next week.)
- Prove that if $G$ is abelian, then left and right congruence are the same relation (i.e. $g_1\sim_{l,H}g_2$ if and only if $g_1\sim_{r,H}g_2$).
- Section 10, problems 1, 3, 6, and 7. (Note: the "left coset" of a group element means its equivalence class with respect to left congruence. The "right coset" means the equivalence class with respect to right congruence. When $G$ is abelian, these two relations coincide, so it is harmless to speak simply of the "coset" of the group element.)