Math 361, Spring 2022, Assignment 4

From cartan.math.umb.edu
Revision as of 14:25, 2 March 2022 by Jingwen.feng001 (talk | contribs) (Definitions and Theorems:)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Read:[edit]

  1. Section 26. (Note that we are skipping forward somewhat in the text; however we will shortly return to the earlier material in Section 20.)

Carefully define the following terms, then give one example and one non-example of each:[edit]

  1. Homomorphism (of rings).
  2. Unital homomorphism (of unital rings).
  3. Pushforward (of a subring under a homomorphism; a.k.a. forward image).
  4. Pullback (of a subring under a homomorphism; a.k.k. pre-image).
  5. Image (of a ring homomorphism).
  6. Kernel (of a ring homomorphism).
  7. Ideal.
  8. R/I (the quotient of the ring R by the two-sided ideal I).
  9. Addition (in R/I, i.e. coset addition).
  10. Multiplication (in R/I, i.e. coset multiplication).

Carefully state the following theorems (you do not need to prove them):[edit]

  1. Theorem concerning ϕ(0R), where ϕ:RS is a ring homomorphism.
  2. Examples of ring homomorphisms ϕ:RS to show that ϕ(1R) may or may not equal 1S, even when R and S are both unital.
  3. Theorem characterizing the properties of the pushforward of a subring (i.e. "The pushforward of a subring is a...").
  4. Theorem characterizing the properties of the pullback of a subring (i.e. "The pullback of a subring is a...").
  5. Theorem characterizing the special properties of kernels (i.e. "Kernels absorb..." or "Kernels are...").
  6. Theorem characterizing ideals which contain units.
  7. Theorem characterizing the ideals of a field.
  8. Theorem characterizing when coset multiplication is well-defined (i.e. "Multiplication in R/I is well-defined provided that I is an...").
  9. Equality test for elements of R/I.

Solve the following problems:[edit]

  1. Section 26, problems 4, 17, and 18 (hint: if ϕ:FS is a homomorphism defined on a field F, then there are not many possibilities for ker(ϕ)).
  2. (Canonical projection) Suppose I is an ideal of a ring R. Define a map π:RR/I by the formula π(r)=r+I. Show that π is an epimorphism, and that it is a unital epimorphism whenever R is a unital ring.
  3. Let π:RR/I be the canonical projection defined above. Calculate ker(π).
  4. Prove that R/{0} is always isomorphic to R itself. (Hint: use the your calculation of ker(π) from the last problem.)
  5. Prove that R/R is always a zero ring. (Hint: use the equality test for cosets.)
  6. We shall see next week that there is one and only one ring homomorphism ϕ:ZZ2×Z3 for which ϕ(1)=(1,1). Write the table of values for this homomorphism, then describe im(ϕ) and ker(ϕ).
  7. Repeat the above exercise with Z2×Z4 in place of Z2×Z3.
  8. By comparing the previous two exercises, see whether you can make any conjecture about the relationship between Za×Zb and Zab. (If you manage this then you will have re-discovered the ancient and beautiful Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT), which we will study next week.)
--------------------End of assignment--------------------

Questions:[edit]

Definitions:

  1. R/I (the quotient of the ring R by the two-sided ideal I).

Theorems:

  1. Examples of ring homomorphisms ϕ:RS to show that ϕ(1R) may or may not equal 1S, even when R and S are both unital.
  2. Theorem characterizing the properties of the pushforward of a subring (i.e. "The pushforward of a subring is a...").
  3. Theorem characterizing the properties of the pullback of a subring (i.e. "The pullback of a subring is a...").

Solutions:[edit]

Definitions and Theorems:[edit]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16HpHcJuiyCkTaeRBan3IsfSl1WO6qCY6/view?usp=sharing

Exam Preparation: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YWB5VtKh7FsHVT8_SBlD0yQ2N4Ylmc1E/view?usp=sharing

Problems:[edit]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15RrqY0HgCub1eHbvhjdIkyzLSdOWZTIi/view?usp=sharing