Math 361, Spring 2022, Assignment 3
From cartan.math.umb.edu
Read:[edit]
- Section 19.
Carefully define the following terms, then give one example and one non-example of each:[edit]
- Zero-divisor.
- Integral domain.
- Field.
- Subring.
- Zero (a.k.a. trivial) subring.
- Improper subring.
- Subring generated by a subset.
- Prime subring (of a unital ring).
Carefully state the following theorems (you do not need to prove them):[edit]
- Zero-product property (of integral domains).
- Cancellation law (in integral domains).
- Theorem relating fields to integral domains.
- Theorem characterizing the units and zero-divisors of Zn.
- Theorem characterizing when Zn is a field, and when it is an integral domain.
Solve the following problems:[edit]
- Section 19, problems 1, 2, 3, 4, and 14 (hint for 14: to show that this matrix is a left zero-divisor, find another matrix whose image in contained in the kernel of this one; to show that it is a right zero-divisor, find another matrix whose kernel contains the image of this one).
- Describe the prime subrings of Q, of R, and of C.
- Describe the prime subring of Z.
- Describe the prime subring of Zn.
- Working in the field Z3, solve the equation x3=x.
- Working in the field Z5, solve the equation x5=x.
- Working in the field Z7, solve the equation x7=x.
- By now you probably have a conjecture about Z11. Do not try to prove this. Instead, prove the conjecture for Zp where p is an arbitrary prime. (Hint: the conjecture is obviously true if x=0. Otherwise x is an element of the group of units of Zp (why?). But as we have seen, Lagrange's Theorem implies that in any group G we have g∣G∣=e for every g∈G. This gives rise to a certain identity for non-zero elements of Zp. Multiplying both sides of this identity by x will prove the conjecture.)
- Show by a simple counterexample (e.g. in Z6) that the result above is not generally true in Zn when n is composite. Exactly which part of your proof above breaks in the composite case?
- Try to correctly generalize the conjecture to the composite case (i.e. formulate and prove a statement which encompasses the prime case but is also true in the composite case). In doing this you will be following in the footsteps of Leonhard Euler; this result (like many others) is known as Euler's Theorem, and it is in fact the mathematical basis of RSA encryption.
Questions:[edit]
Solutions:[edit]
Complete Notes:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1biJbwmyG2FefR-eiZ0QOFmcEOG8aDLud/view?usp=sharing
Definitions:[edit]
- Zero-divisor: Let R be a ring, and a∈R. We say that a is a left zero-divisor (may not be commutative) if 1. a≠0, and 2. ∃b∈R, with b≠0 but ab=0.
- Integral domain: An integral domain is a commutative, unital ring, not the zero ring, which has no zero-divisor.
- Field:A field is a commutative, unital ring, not the zero ring, in which every non-zero element is a unit.
- Subring: Suppose R is a ring, and S⊆R. We say that S is a subring of R if: 1. 0R∈S 2. a,b∈S⇒a+b∈S 3. a∈S⇒−a∈S 4. a.b∈S⇒ab∈S
- Unital Subring: A unital subring of a unital ring R is a subring which contains 1R. This is not the same as a subring which happens to be unital (1S might be different.
- Zero (a.k.a. trivial) subring: Let R be any ring, S={0R} is a subring. The zero subring or the trivial subring. This is the smallest subring.
- Improper subring: et R be any ring, S=R is a subring. The improper subring. This is the largest subring.
- Subring generated by a subset.
- Prime subring (of a unital ring): Suppose R is any unital ring. The prime subring of R is the subring generated by 1R. This is the smallest unital subring.
Theorems:[edit]
- Zero-product property (of integral domains): if D is an \textbf{integral domain}, and a,b∈D with ab=0, then either a=0 or b=0.
- Cancellation law (in integral domains): Suppose D is a domain, a≠0, and ab=ac. Then b=c.
- Theorem relating fields to integral domains: Every field is an integral domain.
- Theorem characterizing the units and zero-divisors of Zn: Suppose [a]∈Z and [a]≠0. Then, 1. If gcd(a,n)=1, then [a] is a unit of Zn. 2. If gcd(a,n)≠1, then [a] is a zero-divisor of Zn.
- Theorem characterizing when Zn is a field, and when it is an integral domain: If n is prime, then Zn is a field. If n is composite, then Zn is not even an integral domain.
Problems:[edit]
Answer to problems:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ieuGx7P7BYDkEANSxwteao4HwZjswYVx/view?usp=sharing
Java Program for the book problems 1, 2, 3, 4:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qhd2Kw4f1v164GG3qfh5Q9nVqbGA59xe/view?usp=sharing