Math 361, Spring 2022, Assignment 3

From cartan.math.umb.edu
Revision as of 05:13, 13 February 2022 by Jingwen.feng001 (talk | contribs) (Problems:)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Read:[edit]

  1. Section 19.

Carefully define the following terms, then give one example and one non-example of each:[edit]

  1. Zero-divisor.
  2. Integral domain.
  3. Field.
  4. Subring.
  5. Zero (a.k.a. trivial) subring.
  6. Improper subring.
  7. Subring generated by a subset.
  8. Prime subring (of a unital ring).

Carefully state the following theorems (you do not need to prove them):[edit]

  1. Zero-product property (of integral domains).
  2. Cancellation law (in integral domains).
  3. Theorem relating fields to integral domains.
  4. Theorem characterizing the units and zero-divisors of Zn.
  5. Theorem characterizing when Zn is a field, and when it is an integral domain.

Solve the following problems:[edit]

  1. Section 19, problems 1, 2, 3, 4, and 14 (hint for 14: to show that this matrix is a left zero-divisor, find another matrix whose image in contained in the kernel of this one; to show that it is a right zero-divisor, find another matrix whose kernel contains the image of this one).
  2. Describe the prime subrings of Q, of R, and of C.
  3. Describe the prime subring of Z.
  4. Describe the prime subring of Zn.
  5. Working in the field Z3, solve the equation x3=x.
  6. Working in the field Z5, solve the equation x5=x.
  7. Working in the field Z7, solve the equation x7=x.
  8. By now you probably have a conjecture about Z11. Do not try to prove this. Instead, prove the conjecture for Zp where p is an arbitrary prime. (Hint: the conjecture is obviously true if x=0. Otherwise x is an element of the group of units of Zp (why?). But as we have seen, Lagrange's Theorem implies that in any group G we have gG=e for every gG. This gives rise to a certain identity for non-zero elements of Zp. Multiplying both sides of this identity by x will prove the conjecture.)
  9. Show by a simple counterexample (e.g. in Z6) that the result above is not generally true in Zn when n is composite. Exactly which part of your proof above breaks in the composite case?
  10. Try to correctly generalize the conjecture to the composite case (i.e. formulate and prove a statement which encompasses the prime case but is also true in the composite case). In doing this you will be following in the footsteps of Leonhard Euler; this result (like many others) is known as Euler's Theorem, and it is in fact the mathematical basis of RSA encryption.
--------------------End of assignment--------------------

Questions:[edit]

Solutions:[edit]

Complete Notes:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1biJbwmyG2FefR-eiZ0QOFmcEOG8aDLud/view?usp=sharing

Definitions:[edit]

  1. Zero-divisor: Let R be a ring, and aR. We say that a is a left zero-divisor (may not be commutative) if 1. a0, and 2. bR, with b0 but ab=0.
  2. Integral domain: An integral domain is a commutative, unital ring, not the zero ring, which has no zero-divisor.
  3. Field:A field is a commutative, unital ring, not the zero ring, in which every non-zero element is a unit.
  4. Subring: Suppose R is a ring, and SR. We say that S is a subring of R if: 1. 0RS 2. a,bSa+bS 3. aSaS 4. a.bSabS
  5. Unital Subring: A unital subring of a unital ring R is a subring which contains 1R. This is not the same as a subring which happens to be unital (1S might be different.
  6. Zero (a.k.a. trivial) subring: Let R be any ring, S={0R} is a subring. The zero subring or the trivial subring. This is the smallest subring.
  7. Improper subring: et R be any ring, S=R is a subring. The improper subring. This is the largest subring.
  8. Subring generated by a subset.
  9. Prime subring (of a unital ring): Suppose R is any unital ring. The prime subring of R is the subring generated by 1R. This is the smallest unital subring.

Theorems:[edit]

  1. Zero-product property (of integral domains): if D is an \textbf{integral domain}, and a,bD with ab=0, then either a=0 or b=0.
  2. Cancellation law (in integral domains): Suppose D is a domain, a0, and ab=ac. Then b=c.
  3. Theorem relating fields to integral domains: Every field is an integral domain.
  4. Theorem characterizing the units and zero-divisors of Zn: Suppose [a]Z and [a]0. Then, 1. If gcd(a,n)=1, then [a] is a unit of Zn. 2. If gcd(a,n)1, then [a] is a zero-divisor of Zn.
  5. Theorem characterizing when Zn is a field, and when it is an integral domain: If n is prime, then Zn is a field. If n is composite, then Zn is not even an integral domain.

Problems:[edit]

Answer to problems:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ieuGx7P7BYDkEANSxwteao4HwZjswYVx/view?usp=sharing

Java Program for the book problems 1, 2, 3, 4:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qhd2Kw4f1v164GG3qfh5Q9nVqbGA59xe/view?usp=sharing